Description: When the earliest Christ-followers were baptized they participated in a politically subversive act. Rejecting the Empireís claim that it had a divine right to rule the world, they pledged their allegiance to a kingdom other than Rome and a king other than Caesar (Acts 17:7). Many books explore baptism from doctrinal or theological perspectives, and focus on issues such as the correct mode of baptism, the proper candidate for baptism, who has the authority to baptize, and whether or not baptism is a symbol or means of grace. By contrast, Caesar and the Sacrament investigates the political nature of baptism. Very few contemporary Christians consider baptismís original purpose or political significance. Only by studying baptism in its historical context, can we discover its impact on first-century believers and the adverse reaction it engendered among Roman and Jewish officials. Since baptism was initially a rite of non-violent resistance, what should its function be today?
Subjects: Bible, New Testament, Synoptic Gospels, Johannine Literature, Acts, Pauline Epistles, Literature
Review by Wes Howard-Brook
Citation: Wes Howard-Brook, review of R. Alan Streett, Caesar and the Sacrament: Baptism: A Rite of Resistance, Review of Biblical Literature [http://www.bookreviews.org] (2018).
Review by Justin Marc Smith
Citation: Justin Marc Smith, review of R. Alan Streett, Caesar and the Sacrament: Baptism: A Rite of Resistance, Review of Biblical Literature [http://www.bookreviews.org] (2020).
Adobe Acrobat Reader
All RBL reviews are published in PDF format. To view these reviews, you must have downloaded and installed the FREE version of Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not have the Reader or you have an older version of the Reader, you can download the most recent version now.