Description: The two questions Paul asked in 1 Cor 10:29b-30 are so intriguing that they must have puzzled the apostle himself, and his readers. This is because the manner these questions were introduced into the discussion of food offered to idols in 1 Cor 8-10 appear neither suitable to the context nor directly answered by Paul's explanations that precede and follow. However, this book maintains that Paul deliberatively introduced the two rhetorical questions into the discourse as a tour de force to disarming the strong in their wrong use of freedom, and a raison detre for choosing not to eat idol food becasue of his concerns for the weak brother. The underlying principle is that, according to Paul, "all things are permissible for me but all things do not benefit; all things are permissible for me but all things do not uplift" (1 Cor 10:23).
Subjects: Bible, New Testament, Pauline Epistles, 1 Corinthians, Literature
Review by Mark A. Jennings
Citation: Mark A. Jennings, review of Moses Taiwo, Paul's Rhetoric in 1 Corinthians 10:29b-30, Review of Biblical Literature [http://www.bookreviews.org] (2009).
Adobe Acrobat Reader
All RBL reviews are published in PDF format. To view these reviews, you must have downloaded and installed the FREE version of Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not have the Reader or you have an older version of the Reader, you can download the most recent version now.