Description: Did Paul have formal training in Greco-Roman rhetoric, or did he learn what he knew of persuasion informally, as social practice? Pauline scholars recognize the importance of this question both for determining Paul’s social status and for conceptualizing the nature of his letters, but they have been unable to reach a consensus. Using 2 Corinthians 10–13 as a test case, Ryan Schellenberg undertakes a set of comparisons with non-Western speakers—most compellingly, the Seneca orator Red Jacket—to demonstrate that the rhetorical strategies Paul employs in this text are also attested in speakers known to have had no formal training in Greco-Roman rhetoric. Since there are no specific indicators of formal training in the way Paul uses these strategies, their appearance in his letters does not constitute evidence that Paul received formal rhetorical education.
Subjects: Bible, New Testament, Pauline Epistles, 2 Corinthians, Literature, Methods, Literary Approaches, Rhetorical Criticism
Review by Fredrick J. Long
Citation: Fredrick J. Long, review of Ryan S. Schellenberg, Rethinking Paul's Rhetorical Education: Comparative Rhetoric and 2 Corinthians 10–13, Review of Biblical Literature [http://www.bookreviews.org] (2014).
Review by Duane F. Watson
Citation: Duane F. Watson, review of Ryan S. Schellenberg, Rethinking Paul's Rhetorical Education: Comparative Rhetoric and 2 Corinthians 10–13, Review of Biblical Literature [http://www.bookreviews.org] (2014).
Adobe Acrobat Reader
All RBL reviews are published in PDF format. To view these reviews, you must have downloaded and installed the FREE version of Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not have the Reader or you have an older version of the Reader, you can download the most recent version now.